Download PDF

Legal and Regulatory Updates for Architects in 2026: Managing Emerging Risks

July 2026

The landscape for architects in 2026 is being reshaped by significant legal, regulatory and commercial pressures. Increasing regulatory scrutiny, rapid digital transformation and artificial intelligence (AI) adoption, onerous contractual and contract administration requirements, tightening insurance conditions, and evolving payment and building safety regimes are collectively raising expectations of practices.

In this environment, it is key for architects to remain alert to market developments and adopt proactive, forward-looking risk management strategies to meet emerging obligations, control liability exposure, safeguard insurability and maintain a competitive edge in an increasingly complex and uncertain market.

Below, we provide a mid-year review of the current landscape, highlighting key developments from earlier this year, together with suggested practical key takeaways to help mitigate risk.

1. Core contractual and commercial risk areas

Contracts and subcontracts in the public sector must reflect the Procurement Act 2023, which came into force on 24 February 2025, particularly on payment, debarment, and rights of suspension or termination.

Amendments to standard forms and bespoke appointments are evolving, often introducing more onerous provisions, especially around building safety and geopolitical risk allocation.  In terms of other developments, the Royal Institute of Architects of Ireland released the  RIAI Construction Contract 2025 in Q4 2025. However, our Digital Roundtable event highlighted that many traditional appointments still fail to include terms addressing emerging risks linked to data, AI and digital delivery.

Geopolitical instability and ongoing sector insolvencies further heighten exposure, making early-stage risk assessment and careful contract negotiation essential. For more information on updates to contract terms please see our earlier update and horizon scan. Recent case law also reinforces the need for strict compliance with payment and notice provisions, while the proposed Commercial Payments Bill is likely to drive further reform, particularly affecting SMEs.

Takeaways: Prioritise clearly defining scope, responsibilities and deliverables; adopt rigorous approaches to risk allocation, change, delay and payment; and ensure contracts adequately address associated AI and digital processes.

2. Governance and compliance risk:

Growing regulatory expectations, including the 2025 updates to the Architects Registration Board (ARB) Code, require architectural practices to implement robust internal controls and maintain clear audit trails. Firms must be able to evidence effective decision-making, quality assurance and risk oversight at project and organisational levels. This is also important when managing related duties and competence requirements, including those arising under building safety regimes (see below).

Proposed further changes to the ARB’s investigation rules further emphasise the importance of understanding professional obligations, maintaining accurate records and demonstrating compliance.

Takeaways: Effective risk management demands a clear understanding of the legal and regulatory framework, supported by strong governance, firm-wide systems and controls, and well-documented training and processes.

3. Digital and AI Risk

Industry reports, including the NBS Digital Construction Report 2025 and the RIBA AI Report 2025, confirm widespread AI adoption, with over two in five construction professionals using it in daily delivery and around 60% of architectural practices integrating it into workflows. While this reflects growing digital maturity and confidence in digital capability, it also introduces new and evolving risks around data management, skills and professional responsibility. Our Digital Wrap-Up contains more information.

Our Digital Roundtable event highlighted that practices must actively manage risks relating to data protection, confidentiality, intellectual property, and contractual liability for AI-generated outputs, as well as issues of accuracy, verification and workforce capability. Crucially, the use of AI does not diminish professional liability: architects remain fully responsible for their outputs. Alongside AI, technologies such as drones are also introducing additional legal and operational risks.

Takeaways: While AI offers clear efficiencies, it requires careful governance. Practices should implement robust AI frameworks, provide targeted training, define acceptable use policies, update appointments and terms, and carry out due diligence on third-party tools and providers.

4. Insurance & professional liability trends

As highlighted in our Insurance Trends 2026 Report, insurers, insured professionals, and brokers are navigating a more complex and fluid market environment, driven among other things by regulatory change, building safety, and wider economic pressures. This is leading to increased scrutiny of insureds, particularly concerning risk management practices and project governance.

Greater emphasis is being placed on risk management, the quality of documentation, record-keeping and audit trails, alongside more tailored insurance policy wordings and exclusions.

Takeaways: Strong governance is critical. Practices should maintain clear, contemporaneous design records, decision logs and project correspondence (including contractual notices), and engage early with brokers and insurers to address emerging risks and support policy renewal discussions.

5. Building safety

Building on themes identified at the 2025 Architects Roundtable, the sector continues to grapple with the far-reaching impact of the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA), particularly the dutyholder regime and gateway process. With varying requirements across the UK and Ireland, practices must ensure compliance with jurisdiction-specific obligations, alongside ongoing developments such as the changes coming into force in Wales in July 2026.

High-rise residential projects remain under pressure, with gateway delays, cautious funder behaviour and evolving regulatory oversight leading to programme disruption and increased client demands. At the same time, a growing body of case law on Remediation Contribution Orders, Building Liability Orders and contribution claims is clarifying the interpretation and application of the BSA, against the backdrop of an increasingly active and aggressive claims environment, particularly regarding fire safety and cladding.

Looking ahead, the proposed Remediation Bill is expected to accelerate cladding remediation through stricter deadlines, with significant implications for designers and their insurers. Wider reforms, including construction products reform, are also likely to influence liability across the supply chain.

Takeaways: Building safety remains a significant and evolving risk for architects across both historic and live projects. Practices must prioritise compliance with the developing regulatory framework, alongside demonstrable competence, clear accountability and robust record-keeping.

Checklist of suggested actions for architectural practices

1. Undertake early-stage risk and project viability assessments: Assess client, project and jurisdictional risks at bid stage, including financial stability, programme or budget pressures and technical and regulatory complexity.
2. Review and update contracts: Ensure contracts reflect current legal and commercial developments, with clear risk allocation (including emerging risks) and alignment with associated risk management processes.
3. Implement robust governance frameworks: Establish clear policies, provide targeted training, and define responsibility and oversight (including for AI use).
4. Engage proactively with boards, brokers and insurers: Be ready to evidence robust controls, governance and documentation, and address emerging risks early in renewal discussions. Changes to corporate reporting and criminal liability processes in the UK mean that such information will also interest leaders.
5. Prioritise compliance: Maintain strict adherence to contractual terms and evolving legal and regulatory frameworks, including dutyholder obligations across all relevant jurisdictions.

Why this matters – Beale & Co’s expertise

Beale & Co combine deep sector expertise across construction law, insurance and claims, AI and digital risk, ESG, and building safety. We understand how these evolving legal, commercial and technical pressures interact in practice, enabling architects to take informed, strategic decisions and manage risk with confidence in an increasingly complex market.

For more information on the items covered above, or to discuss how we can support your projects or contractual arrangements, please contact Andrew Croft, Michael O’Brien and James Hutchinson.

Download PDF