Technology and Construction Court Annual Report 2024-2025 Takeaways

On 20 May 2026, the Technology and Construction Court (“TCC”) published its Annual Report for the year 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025[1]. The report confirms that the TCC remains busy, with a slight increase in new claims issued in London and a continued high settlement rate of around 85%.

The report also highlights developing trends of interest to those in construction, including the continued importance of procurement challenges, adjudication enforcement, the growing volume of Building Safety Act-related claims, the use of CE-File and electronic applications, and the increasing role of technology and artificial intelligence (“AI”) in litigation.

New claims and settlement trends

During the reporting period, 450 new claims were issued in the London TCC, a slight increase from 432 in the previous year. The TCC reported 102 trials listed during the year, of which only 15 were ultimately contested. This reflects a settlement rate of approximately 85%, broadly consistent with recent years.

The report indicates that most cases which proceed to fully contested trials are resolved within around 12 to 18 months from issue to final judgment, depending on the nature of the dispute, the parties’ needs and available judicial resources. Where justified, expedited trials can be accommodated within a matter of weeks.

These figures underline the TCC’s continued focus on proactive case management. At the first case management conference, trial dates are usually fixed at the earliest available date, with the court directing parties to identify the key issues at an early stage. The report also emphasises the continuing importance of alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”), with many claims resolving through mediation or other forms of dispute resolution before trial.

Adjudication enforcement

Adjudication remains a significant part of the TCC’s work. The report records that the London TCC continues to transfer lower value adjudication enforcement claims to the Central London County Court and regional TCC centres where suitable early hearing dates are available. Between October 2024 and September 2025, 99 claims were transferred from the London TCC to regional courts, of which over half (56 claims) were adjudication enforcement proceedings. This approach reflects the TCC’s emphasis on efficiency and proportionality, ensuring that adjudication enforcement claims can be heard promptly by specialist judges.

The continued prominence of adjudication enforcement is also evident in the regional statistics. For example, Leeds recorded 21 adjudication enforcement claims among its High Court TCC cases, while Manchester recorded 19 adjudication-related High Court claims. Liverpool also reported that the vast majority of its new TCC claims were adjudication enforcement claims.

Please visit our Insight page for commentary on adjudication-related disputes.

CE-File and electronic applications

The report confirms the continued importance of CE-File in the administration of TCC claims. Electronic working is mandatory for represented parties in relevant claims and applications, and optional for litigants in person. CE-File enables users to file documents, monitor cases and access relevant public records electronically.

During the reporting period, the number of applications heard orally in the London TCC decreased from 448 to 412. However, the number of orders sealed through CE-File increased to 2,185, an 11.1% increase from the previous two years, both of which were just below 2,000 orders.

The report emphasises that the TCC encourages the use of electronic applications where matters can properly be dealt with without oral argument. This is consistent with the court’s broader emphasis on efficient, proportionate and cost-effective case management.

Other key developments

The report identifies an increase in disputes concerning complex computer software and IT infrastructure systems. It also highlights an increase in claims concerning flammable cladding, fire protection issues and Building Safety Act 2022-related litigation. The introduction of Building Liability Orders, extended limitation periods and the potential for wider corporate liability are expected to give rise to further complex litigation, with the TCC’s BSA Working Group considering whether bespoke procedures may be needed.

The report also refers to the increasing role of AI, both as a subject matter of disputes and in the management and conduct of litigation. A dedicated AI Working Group has been established and has already held seminars for court users.

Conclusion

The 2024-2025 Annual Report demonstrates that the TCC continues to play a central role in resolving complex construction disputes. Adjudication enforcement remains a key feature of the TCC’s work, while CE-File and electronic applications continue to support efficient dispute resolution.

The report points to important emerging areas of future growth, particularly building safety claims, complex IT disputes, environmental group actions and the use of AI in litigation. Parties involved in TCC proceedings should continue to expect proactive case management, early identification of key issues and judicial encouragement to use ADR where appropriate.

If you have any queries regarding the report or would like more information on the trends covered above, please contact James Vernon, Kayleigh Rhodes or Anna Benz.

[1] Annual Report of the Technology and Construction Court 2024-2025, Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, May 2026